Back in 1973 a film was released that would change the moviegoer’s
expectations of how a film should scare them. A simple story of a little girl
possessed by evil would forever raise the bar on the horror genre. The Exorcist
was this film. On the surface it was a pair of priests Father Karras (Jason
Miller) and Father Merrin (Max von Sydow) fighting to drive out a demon from
sweet little Reagan (Linda Blair). The themes of good versus evil run far deeper
in this tale providing the film with far greater depth than any previous horror
flick. Reagan’s mom Chris MacNeil (Ellen Burstyn) is a famous actress, she has
the world in her hand and is used to getting her own way. Separated from the
father of her daughter she finds that her personal life is not as easy to
control as her professional one. Still, that unfortunately normal personal set
back was not able to prepare her for what was to come. Her daughter starts to
act in an unusual manner. She urinates on the carpet during a cocktail party,
speaks to a strange imaginary friend and in general acts as if she is completely
not herself. Now they would probably just load the kid up with Prozac. Chris
takes Reagan to every notable doctor possible and all they can consider is to
seek out a priest for the ancient rite of exorcism. Of course by now the scenes
of horror are indelible ingrained on our collective consciousness. The head
spinning, the vomiting and the levitation of the bed all have become more than
special effects, they are part of film history. With such a classic film one
would have to ask the question ‘How could anyone dare to change it?’ With
alternations that supercede any George Lucas has made in the Star Wars series
the producers of the Exorcist have dared to tamper with history. Numerous
additions have been added to the so-called ‘Director’s Cut’ makes
additions that were originally left on the cutting room floor, left there for
very good reasons. The infamous ‘Spider walk’ scene where Reagan descends
the stairs upside-down, crab style does nothing to advance the plot and ruins
the pacing of the film. The ending change to more focus on the medal the priest
always wore and replaces a concise resolution to the film with ramblings. To be
honest the additional material with the extensive medical tests does help to set
up the scene between the doctors and the mother. Still, the additional material
slows the wonderful pacing of the original with a film over burdened with
unnecessary material.
The casting and acting of this film is what legends are made of. Young Linda
Blair moves with ease between the innocent girl to a demon bent on destroying
the lives around her. While not her first film this was the one that made her,
at the tender age of 14, a household name. Burstyn displayed her usual
professionalism in this film. She displays the arc of a mother going from loving
to concerned and eventually to the brink of madness herself. Miller almost
underplays his role as the younger priest. In this case that was the best
possible decision. His Karras is a man burnt out, losing grip on not only his
relationship with his terminal mother both also on his faith. Von Sydow was at
the top of his game here. He portrays Merrin perfectly. He is a man devoted to
his religion, having now shades of gray in his faith. It is only this
determination that permits him to face such powerful evil even at the cost of
his life.
William Friedkin as the director and William Peter Blatty, the writer has
come to grips with a lot of disagreement over the presentation of this film. In
the two separate commentaries presented in the original DVD release demonstrated
the different viewpoints the two men had over this film that would cement their
careers. The first cut Friedkin presented to the studio was 140 minutes long but
Blatty preferred it but later deferred to the studio suites to trim it to about
two hours. Friedkin preferred the shorter cut often stating the pacing of the
film required a trimmed down script. I have to go with the director on this one.
In the original the film moved along, sweeping the audience into the story. Now,
you may find yourself saying, "that’s different", detracted from the
intent of the story. This is not a film about the special effects, the original
list of effects maintained the pace and expanded the understanding of the
audience. Friedkin knows how to frame a scene. He has a natural eye for the
correct balance between focus on the actors and detail to the set design without
producing clutter. The color palette he uses reflects the emotional drive of the
film. It is often dark and forbidding producing a strange twist on reality. Of
course the Tubular Bells sound track was cutting edge for 1973. It still holds
its own able to underscore the sinister themes with a soundtrack that still
haunts us today.
The best way to present this film would have been utilizing seamless
branching, permitting the audience to select the version desired. This
technology was added to the DVD format specifications for just this reason.
Regardless of the version you choose the audio is a fairly well presented Dolby
5.1 mix. There is a bit lacking for the rear speakers and sub woofer but overall
the sound field created will grab you. The video was a bit dark, which
considering the themes actually worked for me. All versions of the film are
loaded with extras that will add to the understanding and appreciation of this
seminal film. While the Director’s cut seems to be more a Producer’s cut it
does show how a film might have appeared before the public. Personally, I’m a
bit of an old fashioned purist, preferring the classic original, much like Coca
Cola, why mess with something that has been proven over the test of time. No
matter which version you want get this film as a necessary part of any serious
film collections.
Posted 11/5/02